Precedents and doctrine dossier: retrieve reference briefs without scattered research.
Searching past briefs, verifying doctrine and organizing voluminous exhibits consumes valuable associate time. Cytria configures a workflow that indexes your approved templates and firm precedents, without compromising professional secrecy.
No confidential data required for the first conversation.
Three concrete workflows designed for your sector
Each workflow builds on your existing tools and methods to prepare outputs your team directly verifies.
Locate firm precedents and prior briefs across closed matters
Briefs, legal opinions and pleadings drafted across earlier matters contain valuable insight that remains difficult to search. Together, we establish an isolated sovereign perimeter, with zero transmission to public or third-party models. The workflow could retrieve relevant legal reasoning with exact matter references; the attorney evaluates legal suitability, refines the argument and signs the pleading.
Build a chronological index and summary from large exhibit bundles
When litigation begins, client files and opposing exhibits arrive in bulk, requiring hours of manual sorting. We define the document intake and indexing structure suited to your practice. The workflow could extract dates, authors and key topics into an auditable chronological index; legal counsel verifies each entry and selects which exhibits to submit.
Monitor recent Federal Supreme Court rulings in your practice areas
Staying updated on Federal Supreme Court and cantonal rulings relevant to active cases requires continuous monitoring. Together, we define the legal practice areas and priority courts for your firm. The workflow could compile a regular summary of landmark decisions with their official citations; the lawyer analyzes legal applicability and decides whether to cite the precedent in current proceedings.
How your team stays in control
For each selected workflow, we define together the permitted sources, access boundaries and human review checkpoint. No final decision or external communication happens without explicit sign-off from your team.
Technical landscape and professional secrecy
We assess your practice management software (Winjur, LawFirm, SharePoint) and design dedicated sovereign perimeters. No data covered by attorney-client privilege (Art. 321 Swiss Criminal Code) is shared with public models.
How we could proceed
We first agree what needs to change and what is already known. We test a workflow when that will help us decide; if the scope is already clear, we can propose delivery directly.
Scope the work
Review the task, existing tools, available information and the decision to make next.
See the starting options →Test if needed
Try one agreed workflow, review the results with your team and decide whether to continue, adjust or stop.
See the focused test →Put it into use
If the scope or test supports it, agree the production work, responsibilities and support before implementation.
See deployment →Discuss a concrete workflow for your organisation
Direct conversation with Enrico Bartolotti to scope confidentiality rules suited to your practice.
We define the information the workflow may use, who can access it and which actions need review. Hosting, external services and handover conditions are specified for the selected deployment. The first conversation does not require confidential client, employee or beneficiary files.